Search

Showing newest posts with label Sick Healthcare Industry. Show older posts
Showing newest posts with label Sick Healthcare Industry. Show older posts

January 26, 2010

Chondrolysis caused by pain pumps

Some medical stories make me furious. This is one of them. NY Times:

Chondrolysis has ended the athletic careers of dozens of high school and college students. In the most severe cases, it has required joint replacements. Many sufferers face lifetimes of pain and disability.

“I’ve lost so many hours of sleep over this, I can’t tell you,” said Dr. David S. Bailie, an orthopedic surgeon in Scottsdale, Ariz., who said he had seen dozens of cases of chondrolysis since 2005. “There’s nothing worse than a surgeon doing something that causes a problem, not fixes a problem.”

Although it is still unknown why chondrolysis develops, several medical studies have concluded that a likely culprit is a pain pump, a postsurgical medical device used to deliver local anesthetics to a specific area through a plastic tube.

What's really going on here?  Why are people being implanted with high-tech devices for the localized control of pain?   I've had more shoulder operations than anyone I know, and I'll tell you, shoulder pain goes away if you take demerol or morphine.  I've been prescribed these medicines on numerous occasions and they work. 

Kids are having these weird, untested, and dangerous devices put into their bodies because the medical establishment is adverse to prescribing ordinary pain killers to people in pain.   These medicines work and they are far safer than any high-tech alternatives.   Part of the interest in these devices might be lowering hospital costs because administering morphine requires an extended hospital stay.  Ultimately, a confluence of corporate interests -- manufacturers and the insurance companies -- are likely behind the interest in pushing these devices.  That's why mainly only American kids are being implanted with these high-tech devices.  

The article continues:
In late 2006, after a handful of studies indicated that the pain pumps might be causing chondrolysis, the I-Flow Corporation, the largest pump manufacturer, changed its directions in package inserts to advise doctors to avoid placing the pump catheters in joints. In 2007, I-Flow posted a bulletin on its Web site notifying physicians of the risk.

The first lawsuits against pain pump companies were filed about two years ago. It is difficult to know the exact number of suits, but I-Flow reported in November that it was a defendant in 191 chondrolysis cases involving 412 patients. Of those, the company said, 80 suits were dismissed. Kay Jackson, a spokeswoman for the Kimberly-Clark Corporation, which purchased I-Flow last year, declined to comment, citing the pending litigation.
I'm not a doctor, but over the years I've picked up a few basics of orthopedics.  First things: You don't go putting tubes into joints!   Certainly not to control pain. Any physician who would suggest doing this is an complete idiot.  (The risk of infection from the insertion of such a device is too great.  Pain-killing does not warrant such a risk.)  

These companies deserve to be sued.  The first maxim of medicine is DO NO HARM.  That means don't go experimenting with unproven techniques in order to relieve pain -- pain that has safely been controlled for many decades through the non-localized administration of low-cost prescription medication.

Read more...

September 10, 2008

Surgery for arthritis more dangerous than alternative

The NY Times reports that "a study has found that surgery is no better than more conservative treatment to relieve knee pain caused by arthritis."

To call surgery "no better" strikes me as somewhat misleading. Conservative treatments do not carry the risks of complication associated with surgery. For example, one in four patients who gets treated in a hospital develops a new probleml. Perhaps an infection, an adverse drug reaction, etc.

Read more...

May 15, 2008

Further evidence the FDA is in industry's pocket

The controversy over the safety of the chemical bisphenol A continues, as the U.S. FDA issues a statement saying that the agency sees no reason to tell consumers to stop using products that contain it, Reuters reports. This includes polycarbonate baby bottles, water bottles and more (which should be labeled with the #7 recycling code).

If such major players are clearly expressing concern over BPA, what legs does the FDA have to stand on for its reassurance? According to Reuters, the FDA's associate commissioner for science, Norris Alderson, said the feds are reviewing safety concerns, and pointed to two industry-funded studies claiming it poses no risk.

Daily Green

Read more...

December 24, 2007

An insurance policy from Cigna Health Care proved worthelss

Nataline Sarkisyan is dead. Who killed her?

Mark Geragos, her family's lawyer wants the Los Angeles DA to press murder or manslaughter charges against Cigna HealthCare. He argues the firm "maliciously killed" Nataline Sarkisyan by its reluctance to pay for her treatment.

The health insurer refused to pay for a liver transplant until hours before and she died on Thursday night. This case perfectly illustrates the disgrace that is the US healthcare regime in a nutshell. It's a system that puts corporate profits ahead of sound medical practice. The Guardian reports:

Although she was fully insured and had a matching donor, Cigna refused to pay on the grounds that her healthcare plan "does not cover experimental, investigational and unproven services".

Cigna's rejection on December 11 led Sarkisyan's doctors at UCLA medical centre, including the head of its transplant unit, to write a letter to protest that the treatment which they proposed was neither experimental nor unproven. They called on the firm to urgently review its decision.
American's health insurance system is stressful for patients -- especially if you have health insurance. It's also stressful for physicians. They waste time on paperwork like the letters they wrote on Nataline's behalf. These world class doctors might have been treating other patients, but instead they had to waste time arguing with some idiotic manager at the HMO -- Cigna HeathCare. The system forces them to write letters in which they must explain the fine points of medicine. They must justify your treatment to insurance company clerks. These overworked and underpaid insurance company clerks then second-guess the expert opinion of top surgeons. No wonder the US has the most expensive healthcare in the world!

What can Americans do to ensure there will be no more patients like Nataline Sarkisyan?

It's no use petitioning Cigna. The problem here is systemic. It's not confined to Cigna. There are thousands of Nataline Sarkisyans, but you don't read about them becuase they are the age of your parents or grandparents. Any solution must be political.

The answer is to support Senator John Edward's campaign for the presidency of the United States. He is the only candidate who talks about taking on the big insurance companies. Moreover, the man has a decent shot at winning his party's nomination. Somebody at his campaign HQ is already blogging about the Nataline Sarkisyan case.

Back in August I wrote about Edwards at Jotman.com. There you can read why I think Edwards -- like no other candidate in the Democratic Party -- understands the underlying problem facing the United States. Edwards is fighting for something larger than his political career.

Photo: An ad for Michael Moore's documentary Sicko. Cigna HealthCare was featured in the documentary.

Read more...

Travel

  © Blogger template ProBlogger Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP